Jump to content


Global Warming and Space


  • You cannot reply to this topic
34 replies to this topic

#1 Zach

    "z" cisco one

  • Exec Staff!
  • 5,685 posts

Posted 27 October 2006 - 10:59 AM

Link

Al Gore recently spoke about global warming, announcing that it may be possible to slow global warming through space, and urging the private sector to lend some muscle to the project. Since the internet originally began as a government project (Department of Defense) he believes that if private companies invest in the project, space will become much more attainable much faster for much less cost.

Any thoughts?
Bringing knives to gun fights for over 25 years.

I reserve the right to say "Don't be a prick," yet be one myself.

"*high whiny bitch voice* Meh meh meh meh, my name is Zach, and I am an asshole!" - Adina

Posted Image

#2 Lexi

    The Dirty Minded One

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 465 posts

Posted 27 October 2006 - 11:31 AM

global warming is part of natural law. it occurs on a regular basis. we've just been in something of an ice age for the past several hundred years. without entirely cutting out the use of fossil fuels and pollutants, there isn't much that can or will slow global warming.
Posted Image
"You would totally make an awesome creepy murderer chick."

[[ o1 . o2 . o3 ]]

#3 westclox

    Veteran IRBer

  • Guests
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 533 posts

Posted 27 October 2006 - 11:35 AM

QUOTE(Lexi @ Oct 27 2006, 11:31 AM) View Post

global warming is part of natural law. it occurs on a regular basis. we've just been in something of an ice age for the past several hundred years. without entirely cutting out the use of fossil fuels and pollutants, there isn't much that can or will slow global warming.



that really isnt true.

i have spoken with many (soon to be and already) doctorates in chemistry, chemical engineering and civil engineering on the subject, albeit over a few beers, and they belive it is entirely pheasable to create a process to reverse global warming. as CO2 is measured in ppm (parts per million) it really wouldnt take a MASSIVE scale project for results.

#4 Lexi

    The Dirty Minded One

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 465 posts

Posted 27 October 2006 - 11:56 AM

it won't reverse it. its a scientifically proven fact that the earth naturally warms and cools. There is no way to truly stop nature. if it's going to occur, it will. and it is. admittedly, we're not helping things, but there's no way of entirely reversing it.

and.. if we want to get really philosophical about the topic, then how to we even know that science is truly correct? We say it is because of validity- the fact that it can be repeated, tested and proven time and time again- but does that mean that it's actually right?

as far as i see it, it's better not to mess with nature and attempt to change it. It is what it is & it occurs because of natural law. Why change it and try to control it? the human race is getting slightly ahead of itself on that one.
Posted Image
"You would totally make an awesome creepy murderer chick."

[[ o1 . o2 . o3 ]]

#5 Rex

    Regular IRBer

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 316 posts

Posted 27 October 2006 - 05:26 PM

by the time we figure it out ill be dead so i doubt any imput i have will really help
He who laughs last... thinks slowest

#6 westclox

    Veteran IRBer

  • Guests
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 533 posts

Posted 28 October 2006 - 03:41 AM

QUOTE(Lexi @ Oct 27 2006, 11:56 AM) View Post

it won't reverse it. its a scientifically proven fact that the earth naturally warms and cools. There is no way to truly stop nature. if it's going to occur, it will. and it is. admittedly, we're not helping things, but there's no way of entirely reversing it.

and.. if we want to get really philosophical about the topic, then how to we even know that science is truly correct? We say it is because of validity- the fact that it can be repeated, tested and proven time and time again- but does that mean that it's actually right?

as far as i see it, it's better not to mess with nature and attempt to change it. It is what it is & it occurs because of natural law. Why change it and try to control it? the human race is getting slightly ahead of itself on that one.



yes the answer to a scientific problem lies in philosophy.

to reverse the problem, reverse the cause.

CO2 NO MO NO2 = problem

our current situation has nothing to do with nature. we accelerated a natural thing that happens over MILLIONS of years. We have thrown up more CO2 than any forest fire volcano, or anything ever could.

Edited by westclox, 28 October 2006 - 03:41 AM.


#7 Rynfish

    god amongst ferrets

  • Regular Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 111 posts

Posted 28 October 2006 - 09:07 AM

QUOTE(westclox @ Oct 27 2006, 06:35 PM) View Post

that really isnt true.

i have spoken with many (soon to be and already) doctorates in chemistry, chemical engineering and civil engineering on the subject, albeit over a few beers, and they belive it is entirely pheasable to create a process to reverse global warming. as CO2 is measured in ppm (parts per million) it really wouldnt take a MASSIVE scale project for results.



Wow what interesting conversations you have with every doctorates in chemistry, chemical engineering and civil engineering you meet

#8 Red

    EXPIRED

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,053 posts

Posted 28 October 2006 - 01:32 PM

Maybe we can't reverse it but we can slow it down.

I think it's sick how some people don't care what we're doing to our World. Silly as we are, we wait until we're directly affected to help fight a problem.
Posted Image

#9 westclox

    Veteran IRBer

  • Guests
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 533 posts

Posted 28 October 2006 - 03:55 PM

QUOTE(Ryan @ Oct 28 2006, 09:07 AM) View Post

Wow what interesting conversations you have with every doctorates in chemistry, chemical engineering and civil engineering you meet


we also talk about the chemical makeup of jakki degg and the ideal breast size to height ratio. its an engineering thing.

#10 Zach

    "z" cisco one

  • Exec Staff!
  • 5,685 posts

Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:08 PM

Breast size to height ratio, now THERE is a conversation I could enjoy.
Bringing knives to gun fights for over 25 years.

I reserve the right to say "Don't be a prick," yet be one myself.

"*high whiny bitch voice* Meh meh meh meh, my name is Zach, and I am an asshole!" - Adina

Posted Image

#11 westclox

    Veteran IRBer

  • Guests
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 533 posts

Posted 29 October 2006 - 06:29 AM

clearly neither of you should follow me around for the day

zach could win a sarcasm contest however.

#12 Zach

    "z" cisco one

  • Exec Staff!
  • 5,685 posts

Posted 29 October 2006 - 01:06 PM

Who said ANYTHING about me being sarcastic? I probably would enjoy that conversation immensely, but all my friends ever want to talk about is video games.
Bringing knives to gun fights for over 25 years.

I reserve the right to say "Don't be a prick," yet be one myself.

"*high whiny bitch voice* Meh meh meh meh, my name is Zach, and I am an asshole!" - Adina

Posted Image

#13 Orangejuice

    LL OJ

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,208 posts

Posted 01 November 2006 - 03:29 AM

Excuse me if I want to get back to the topic.
How is space gonna help us with global warming?
Apart from moving to mars once we've fucked up Earth!
TRG Legend
Actor for St. Annes Players and Mr Spielburg!

#14 Red

    EXPIRED

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,053 posts

Posted 05 November 2006 - 02:08 PM

So since we "fucked up Earth" we should accept it and not try anything new to help better our mistakes??
Posted Image

#15 CaptainHenreh

    Irregular Satanic Ferret Offerings Please Me

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 411 posts

Posted 08 November 2006 - 08:00 PM

Al Gore is a moron.

#16 Red

    EXPIRED

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,053 posts

Posted 10 November 2006 - 06:40 PM

I disagree.
Posted Image

#17 CaptainHenreh

    Irregular Satanic Ferret Offerings Please Me

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 411 posts

Posted 12 November 2006 - 05:59 PM

QUOTE(Red @ Nov 10 2006, 07:40 PM) View Post

I disagree.


It is the right of every human to delude themselves.

tongue.gif

#18 The One

    The One Lougan

  • The One
  • 5,612 posts

Posted 12 November 2006 - 06:39 PM

Perhaps humans arent the cause of global warming, perhaps humans are the cause. Here is what I have to say, whether global warming is humanities fault or not. The idea is, we may or may not have something to do with the current warming trend.

But what everyone should be worried about, is that what we are doing NOW, could lead to something in the future. We did cause a hole in the ozone layer. We can affect the climate around us. We have destroyed entire eco-systems, burt down entire rainforests, and killed off thousands of coral reefs. We can affect our environment.

And just because earth does go through warming trends up and down, doesnt mean this current one isnt our fault. I can get sick naturally. But that doesnt mean that someone cant get me sick unnaturally.

And your right, who knows if science is right. But what are the consquences if science isnt wrong?







Sent from my iPad











#19 MagicOPromotion

    beginner ferret

  • New Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts

Posted 26 May 2009 - 06:13 AM

o, and global warming isnt the bad thing. it is what global warming will cause. its like hiv isnt what kills someone but what hiv causes. well, not a perfect analogy but u get it.

#20 milkblood

    tell them with napalm

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 722 posts

Posted 26 May 2009 - 10:25 AM

laugh.gif
QUOTE
i worte a book about modern kinematics and stationary particle systems.


but i lost it one day on a train

-westclox





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users